Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:54:39AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 03 November 2006 11:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ah, i thought there was some automatic tool, or whatever, so much for
> > me, next time i will make sure to CC debian-boot or something, that
>
> Please discuss it on the list _before_ you file a bug report.
>
> > said i was kill-filled by most of you guys, so i was not sure how
> > useful it is. Now, apparently you are not kill-filling me anymore :)
>
> I have _never_ kill-filed you for listmail.
>
> > BTW, i still don't understand the problem with non-di-image low
> > priority additional .udebs.
>
> Read again my answer to Otavio. It is in there.
> The udeb section was created specifically for Debian Installer. IMO that
> means that the d-i team has veto rights over anything that goes in there.
Ok, fine and all. But that gives absolutely no hint on why you would veto it,
which is what i am asking.
It is not easy to discuss things, if you get non-reply, and "that is the way
it is and accept it" kind of replies, nor if you need to make 2-3 exchanges of
emails in order to even get the question to get noticed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: