On Friday 03 November 2006 11:33, Sven Luther wrote: > Ah, i thought there was some automatic tool, or whatever, so much for > me, next time i will make sure to CC debian-boot or something, that Please discuss it on the list _before_ you file a bug report. > said i was kill-filled by most of you guys, so i was not sure how > useful it is. Now, apparently you are not kill-filling me anymore :) I have _never_ kill-filed you for listmail. > BTW, i still don't understand the problem with non-di-image low > priority additional .udebs. Read again my answer to Otavio. It is in there. The udeb section was created specifically for Debian Installer. IMO that means that the d-i team has veto rights over anything that goes in there. The logical consequence of that is that new udebs should be discussed on the debian-boot list before they are requested or created. Again, possibly with the exception of architecture specific things (which should be discussed with/between the d-i porters). However, even for these discussing, or at least announcing, them on the list would be welcome.
Attachment:
pgpSml3cJHqFi.pgp
Description: PGP signature