[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#389285: marked as done (failed installation after hang on "configuring apt")



Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:42:28 +0200
with message-id <20060926214228.GP3859@gpm.stappers.nl>
and subject line Bug#389285: failed installation after hang on "configuring apt"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: netinst 
Image version: Daily, Sept 24, 2006 - from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sept 24, 2006

Machine: VMPLAYER on Hp Pavilion zv5120us laptop
Processor: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 1136MB RAM & 956MB swap on laptop; 512MB RAM & 512MB swap on
virtualization
Partitions: <df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred>

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
=That of the virtualized machine=
lspci

lspci -n

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E]
Reboot:                 [O] from tty2

Comments / Problems:

* Framebuffer console is very slow with vmware, which hogs cpu (%100
even when selecting options of partitioner)
* "validation" of package zlib1g (during base system install) takes a
long time
* During base install, "installing core packages" and "unpacking the
base system" could list some of those packages below in a box
* Selecting a mirror: could calculate and suggest fastest mirror to the
user
!*! Hangs at "Configuring apt" (%60) for too long without explanation:
had to reboot without going further
* no way to resume failed installation




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:38:07PM -0400, t u wrote:
> > And which algoritm for calculation of the fastest mirror do you suggest?
> > 
> 
> :) that's a question well over my league. may be ping mirrors avaliable
> to chosen area / country and sugest the one that pings the fastest? I'm
> not sure though.

Calculation of the fastest mirror is very though.
( I don't dare to say it can't be done )

As far as I'm concerned, is the current approach the best one:

   Assume a smart user.

It also allows an user to learn and a local apt archive which won't be
in list of archives to be probe for the fastest, but _is_ the fastest.

> >> !*! Hangs at "Configuring apt" (%60) for too long without explanation:
> >> had to reboot without going further
> > 
> > Please do another install attempt. 
> 
> second attempt worked :)

Okay, I'm closing this bugreport.

> >> * no way to resume failed installation
> > 
> > Yes, that is the consequence of the reboot before finnished install.
> 
> is there a way to not make it that way? the base installation succeeded,
> so I think I had a working system minus grub. I am not sure at all, but
> if the install CD had an option to "boot to existing install to recover"
> I could have managed to finish the installation.

The installer has the boot option "rescue" that can (re)install grub.

> Again, I'm not sure if that could be done and I'm not sure if I'm asking
> for too much :)
> 
> thanks again

Have fun with your Debian GNU/Linux computer  (inside VMWARE)
and don't worry about questions.


Cheers
Geert Stappers
-- 
Questions are the start of wisdom.    --Lt. Worff 

--- End Message ---

Reply to: