Re: The possibility of SELinux targeted policy in the default install
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> writes:
> On Friday 15 September 2006 00:52, srivasta@acm.org wrote:
>> > Promoting selinux to standard is probably a post-Etch issue anyway
>> > as there is currently very little feedback and AIUI quite a bit of
>> > tuning is needed yet.
>>
>> If you say enabling SELinux by default, like fedora ships it I
>> agree it is a post-Etch task.
>
> No, I meant promoting the priority of the selinux packages to "standard"
> in the overrides files, and thus officially making them a default part of
> any (except a bare-bones) Debian system.
> I feel that having a task install them is the better option for Etch.
Doing that allow us, in grub-installer, check if it's going to be
installed and hack menu.lst by default.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: