partman-auto-crypto
Hi all,
I'd like to start working on getting partman-auto-crypto into d-i again.
As far as I know there are two outstanding issues:
1) Swap on LVM in partman-auto-lvm
I sent an RFC on this more than a month ago. Not much discussion
resulted, I got a few positive comments and no negative comments. Is
this ok to commit?
2) Concerns over an overcrowded partman-auto menu
FJP suggested in the RFC thread on partman-auto-crypto that the
partman-auto main menu might need to change to accomodate the large
number of options. The following example was given:
<example>
Manually edit partition table
SCSI1 (0.0.0) (sda) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
Erase entire disk and create new partitions
Erase entire disk; use LVM for new partitions
Erase entire disk; use LVM for new encrypted partitions
SCSI2 (0.0.1) (sdb) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
Erase entire disk and create new partitions
Erase entire disk; use LVM for new partitions
Erase entire disk; use LVM for new encrypted partitions
</example>
However, I think that we should split it into two screens:
<example>
Manually edit partition table
Erase disk and create new partitions
Erase disk(s); use LVM for new partitions
Erase disk(s); use LVM for new encrypted partitions
<example>
If you select "Erase disk and create new partitions" you'd then get:
<example>
Please select the disk to erase:
SCSI1 (0.0.0) (sda) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
SCSI2 (0.0.1) (sdb) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
SCSI2 (0.0.1) (sdc) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
</example>
Where you can select a single disk, whereas the "Erase disk(s); use LVM
for new partitions" would show:
<example>
Please select the disk(s) to erase and use with LVM:
[*] SCSI1 (0.0.0) (sda) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
[ ] SCSI2 (0.0.1) (sdb) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
[ ] SCSI2 (0.0.1) (sdc) - 2.1 GB VMware, ...
</example>
This allows multiple disks to be used for LVM or RAID and should
simplify the preseeding to use two values: method and disks to use.
Not something that is very important to me though, as long as some
progress can be made on adding partman-auto-crypto :)
Comments?
Regards,
David
Reply to: