[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Solution for module problem

On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:21:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 24 June 2006 19:53, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Disadvantages:
> Another potential disadvantage could be that one binary forces all users 
> that need/want only one (related set) of those modules to install all of 
> them.

Yes. And without building one package per module, this is not possible
at all.

> I guess that how much of a problem this is depends on what modules will be 
> included in the binary and to what extend they will be autoloaded (by 
> udev for example).

The most of them should provide proper device tables.

Also the current list includes some mutual exclusive sets of modules. So
it needs to build more than one binary package.


Another dream that failed.  There's nothing sadder.
		-- Kirk, "This side of Paradise", stardate 3417.3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: