[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: confirm_changes

On Tuesday 20 June 2006 23:34, David Härdeman wrote:
> Oh yes, good catch. I'm fairly certain that all templates should be
> asked at the same level, but I'm not sure which level is "best". I'll
> go with what's currently in partman-base/partman unless someone
> objects.

confirm_nochanges should probably be critical (especially as it's default 
is false).

Attachment: pgpy7z5vdahV0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: