[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: confirm_changes

On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:18:37PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:14:09PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
Looking at the above mentioned comparison, there are three differences:

1) The templates used
	This can be taken care of with a parameter as you mentioned

1.5) The priorities at which some templates are asked (high vs.
critical). One example is $package/confirm_nochanges - it is high
in partman-base and -md but critical in -crypto and -lvm. I'm not sure this difference is intentional/meaningful though?

Oh yes, good catch. I'm fairly certain that all templates should be asked at the same level, but I'm not sure which level is "best". I'll go with what's currently in partman-base/partman unless someone objects.

Reply to: