On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 01:11:40PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > >Unblocking libdebian-installer 0.97 might cause problems due to this > >change: > > * archdetect: Rename sb1-swarm-bn to sb1-bcm91250a for consistency. > Then Martin Michlmayr clarified (at least for me) that the problem was > risking to break a MIPS subarch getting 1 to 3 insts. on popcon for > beta2 installs. > Bastian Blank replied to Martin's mail: > >We will glue the libdi transition to the newt transition. > I failed to get a clarification from him, but from an IRC discussion I > had with him the day before that post, I'm pretty sure he meant that an > upcoming libdi transition and the newt transition would be tied *if* > libdi doesn't transition to testing now. > In summary, the only problem which is expected from unblocking libd-i is > to break beta2 installs on a rare subarch. Based on this, I've gone ahead and added hints for libd-i, cdebconf, and newt. The newt/cdebconf hints won't have an effect for another 9 days, but the libd-i hint should go through immediately. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature