[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#366405: marked as done (Netinstall Etch or Sid (pppoe))



Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 19:26:45 -0400
with message-id <20060508232645.GA11810@kitenet.net>
and subject line Netinstall Etch or Sid (pppoe)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer

On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:52:59PM +0200, Matthias Popp wrote:
> Am Montag, 8. Mai 2006 11:55 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:01:29AM +0200, Matthias Popp wrote:
> > > Hallo , 
> > > 
> > > I am missing the package pppoe on the netinstall.isos
> > > 
> > > I have the the isos from 20060506
> > 
> > 
> > According our FAQ
> >  at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/FAQ#head-5a523e8e63ffeee84d8607285d6a96538fa59ace
> > it should work.
> > 
> > Should this be promoted to a bugreport?
> > Or is pppoe only on the full CD? (and the doc should be updated?)
> 
> This is definitive a bug. I can't find this package in the businesscard
> and netinst.iso  from  20060508 either , only in the full CD Set
> And pppoe is on Disc 3, this is a bug too. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> with best regards from Dortmund 
>                                                         Matthias

It is now filed as a bug.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The package is not pppoe, but pppoeconf. This is present on the netinst
CD.

Quoting the FAQ:

  PPPoE configuration is provided by pppoeconf

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: