Samuel Thibault wrote: > Ah, yes, sorry, this list probably needs some cleaning up indeed :) > Here is a maybe more reasonnable list: > > belkin_sa ? > whiteheat ? > digi_acceleport ? > cp2101 ? > ftdi_sio ? > mct_u232 ? > pl2303 ? These look ok. > ir-usb ? Only useful if you have an infrared connection and cannot run a proper irda stack on both ends, so I don't think we need it. > safe_serial ? I can't tell from the description if this supports some wacky hardware, or just tries to be a more robust standard serial driver. Either way it doesn't look very likely. > These looked really like generic usb to rs232 converters, so having them > in d-i is useful for installing debian over a serial port, for instance. Ok, will you want the new usb-serial-modules package built for the stock 2.6 (and 2.4?) i386 and amd64 kernels? -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature