On Wednesday 08 February 2006 06:35, Frans Pop wrote: > The only difference may be that in this test extra packages > (apt-install run) install correctly. It's only at pkgsel that things > fail. This is in fact the same as what Martin sees. The first error is in fact during apt-setup and thus earlier than Martin mentions: W: GPG error: http://<hostname> etch Release: unknown error running gpgv W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems Which explains why running apt-get update does "fix" things. There are also loads of "time stamp <date> is <huge number> s in the future" warnings from tar in the log. Maybe we should add a simple check at the beginning of the install to check if system date is sane?
Attachment:
pgpNCcFnB0ejn.pgp
Description: PGP signature