On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:04:35PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > So what exactly does he prefer over what? > Because reading this the "arabic" folder _is_ nazli... exactly: I suppose it can be read as "the bold font which I see in the arabic screenshot looks great". What scares me is the set of missing glyphs. To exclude any sort of conflict I created and uploaded in [1] a g-i image containing only nazli.ttf: no other ttf file included. Ciao Davide [1] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/g-i/mini_only_nazli.iso
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature