On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:42:18AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > *2.6 installation floppies > *2.6.11 installer > (this could have the danger that backporting changes to Sarge for the > 2.6.8 kernel could become more tricky, but advantage is we get a > solution for all those SATA problems) Given that sarge is branched in the repo, I don't see any way at all that this would have an impact on sarge backports, and it's clearly a necessary step since we're not keeping 2.6.8 around for etch. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature