[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#289918: marked as done ()

Your message dated Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:53:29 +0100
with message-id <200501120153.30171.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#289918:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 20:29:28 +0000
>From muramas@cyberdiscordia.org Tue Jan 11 12:29:28 2005
Return-path: <muramas@cyberdiscordia.org>
Received: from dotwell.org (kosh.chaos) [141.154.255.165] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CoSdr-0005ru-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:29:27 -0800
Received: from kosh ([127.0.0.1] ident=muramas)
	by kosh.chaos with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CoOxf-0004Na-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:33:39 -0500
Subject: 
From: Matt Barry <muramas@cyberdiscordia.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Hazel Mollusk Consulting Group
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:33:38 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] 1105461219.16337.29.camel@kosh>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	NOSUBJECT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: Jan 11, 2005, from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux mu 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 01/11/2005 14:00:00
Method: netinst CD, RC2 release of debian-installer
	Booted from CD, installed from ftp.us.debian.org, through a proxy (squid)

Machine: IBM eServer xSeries 225
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz stepping 07
Memory:1024 MB -  901508k/917504k available (1065k kernel code, 15592k reserved, 457k data, 96k init, 0k highmem)
Root Device: SCSI (/dev/sda) - RAID 1 array (two 73.4GB disks)
Root Size/partition table: 
	Disk /dev/sda: 73.4 GB, 73406611456 bytes
	255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 8924 cylinders
	Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

	Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
	/dev/sda1   *           1        8586    68967013+  83  Linux (mounted ext3 on /)
	/dev/sda2            8587        8924     2714985    f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
	/dev/sda5            8587        8924     2714953+  82  Linux swap

df -h ->  /dev/sda1              65G  647M   61G   2% /

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

mu:~# lspci
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. E7505 Memory Controller Hub (rev 03)
0000:00:00.1 ff00: Intel Corp. E7505/E7205 Series RAS Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7505/E7205 PCI-to-AGP Bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7505 Hub Interface B PCI-to-PCI Bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:02.1 ff00: Intel Corp. E7505 Hub Interface B PCI-to-PCI Bridge RAS Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-M) USB 2.0 EHCI Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 82)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL (ICH4/ICH4-L) LPC Bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL (ICH4/ICH4-L) UltraATA-100 IDE Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) SMBus Controller (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
0000:02:1c.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04)
0000:02:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04)
0000:02:1e.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04)
0000:02:1f.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04)
0000:03:01.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703X Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02)
0000:03:02.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7892A U160/m (rev 02)
0000:04:03.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)
0000:04:03.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)
0000:05:01.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)

mu:~# lspci -n
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:2550 (rev 03)
0000:00:00.1 ff00: 8086:2551 (rev 03)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:2552 (rev 03)
0000:00:02.0 0604: 8086:2553 (rev 03)
0000:00:02.1 ff00: 8086:2554 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:24c2 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:24c4 (rev 02)
0000:00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:24cd (rev 02)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev 82)
0000:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:24c0 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:24cb (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:24c3 (rev 02)
0000:00:1f.5 0401: 8086:24c5 (rev 02)
0000:02:1c.0 0800: 8086:1461 (rev 04)
0000:02:1d.0 0604: 8086:1460 (rev 04)
0000:02:1e.0 0800: 8086:1461 (rev 04)
0000:02:1f.0 0604: 8086:1460 (rev 04)
0000:03:01.0 0200: 14e4:16a7 (rev 02)
0000:03:02.0 0100: 9005:0080 (rev 02)
0000:04:03.0 0100: 1000:0030 (rev 07)
0000:04:03.1 0100: 1000:0030 (rev 07)
0000:05:01.0 0300: 1002:4752 (rev 27)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [E*]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:

* Initially (on two attempts, just to be sure) the installer told me it
was unable to configure the network; by the time I checked it using
ifconfig it had completed DHCP and had an IP address.  It could be our
DHCP server is too slow, though I've never noticed the problem
elsewhere.  Maybe the timeout could have been extended by a few
seconds... (note: selecting "retry" here worked just fine)

Otherwise the installation worked remarkably smoothly; my only remaining
comments:

- I was surprised that the only templates for partition schemes were
either "all-in-one", or desktop/workstation (at least they were named as
such).. maybe one of these would also be appropriate for installing
servers (didn't try them), but this could be a little confusing for
someone who knows they are installing a server (not a desktop or
multi-user workstation).  (Granted, a server administrator should
probably have little trouble configuring the partitions him/herself..
but another option with sane defaults might not hurt either..)


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289918-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 00:54:02 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Tue Jan 11 16:54:02 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CoWlu-0004O0-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:54:02 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.11] ident=fjp)
	by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CoWlP-00064U-OQ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:53:31 +0100
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: Matt Barry <muramas@cyberdiscordia.org>,
 289918-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#289918:
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:53:29 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <[🔎] 1105461219.16337.29.camel@kosh>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1105461219.16337.29.camel@kosh>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200501120153.30171.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 289918-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tuesday 11 January 2005 17:33, Matt Barry wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
>
> * Initially (on two attempts, just to be sure) the installer told me it
> was unable to configure the network; by the time I checked it using
> ifconfig it had completed DHCP and had an IP address.  It could be our
> DHCP server is too slow, though I've never noticed the problem
> elsewhere.  Maybe the timeout could have been extended by a few
> seconds... (note: selecting "retry" here worked just fine)

This happens occasionally and is the reason for the try again option. On 
my home network, DHCP is always detected within the first 30% of the 
progress bar.
We do not consider this an installer problem.

> - I was surprised that the only templates for partition schemes were
> either "all-in-one", or desktop/workstation (at least they were named
> as such).. maybe one of these would also be appropriate for installing
> servers (didn't try them), but this could be a little confusing for
> someone who knows they are installing a server (not a desktop or
> multi-user workstation).  (Granted, a server administrator should
> probably have little trouble configuring the partitions him/herself..
> but another option with sane defaults might not hurt either..)

Well, one off the reasons is probably that the partitioning on a server 
depends very much on the use it will be put to. Also, a server is more 
likely to want to use RAID and/or LVM.

As there were no real issues in your installation, I'm closing the report.
Thanks you for submitting it and your comments.

Cheers,
FJP
Reply to: