[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#260763: [powerpc] Problems with logical volume setup during installation



On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:45:00AM -0800, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
>     "Sven" == Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> 
>     Sven> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Shyamal Prasad
>     Sven> wrote:
> 
>     >> I created a partition with type Linux_LVM and name LVM_Test
>     >> using mac-fdisk. I put an ext3 file system on the partition so
>     >> I could fsck/mount it to see if the Mac OS programs or OF
>     >> screwed around with the partition data itself. Then I did the
>     >> following tests.
>     >> 
>     >> Booted into Mac OS X 10.3.7 (Open Firmware 5.1.8f7) and used
>     >> the Disk Utility to look at the partitions. The test partition
>     >> shows up, and a "Get Info" showed its type as
>     >> 'Linux_LVM'. Booted back into Linux and the Linux_LVM partition
>     >> was still good.
> 
>     Sven> Tell me, when you create a Apple_UNIX_SVR2 partition, does
>     Sven> it show up too ?
> 
> Actually, yes. The latest Disk Utility seems to show all partitions
> other than the Apple_Bootstrap partition and those mysterious ones
> that I believe are related to the partition map itself (the first one
> annd the last one, I think). So I can see the Apple_UNIX_SVR2
> partitions too.

Ok, cool, so we can without risk choose those partition types.

> On the older MacOS releases only the HFS+ partition shows up.
> 
>     Sven> I guess not, then this would be the main difference, and we
>     Sven> have to see if :
> 
>     Sven>   1) we can get apple to recognize those.
> 
> I don't believe this is a problem with the latest Mac OS X.
> 
>     Sven>   2) people can live with this smallish difference.
> 
> If they are running Linux and BSD on older MacOS I suppose they
> already do :-)

Bah.

Anyway, next step is to get the lvm-tools debian maintainer informed of our
choice, and get his opinion of this. The lvm-tools maintainer and the mdadm
too for raid stuff.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: