[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#288205: marked as done (Installation Reports)



Your message dated Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:13:20 +0100
with message-id <20050103171320.GE6841@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug#288205: Installation Reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2005 13:36:18 +0000
>From nicholas.bartle@btopenworld.com Sun Jan 02 05:36:18 2005
Return-path: <nicholas.bartle@btopenworld.com>
Received: from smtp804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.12.141] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cl5u5-0000Cl-00; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:36:17 -0800
Received: from unknown (HELO Athlon) (nicholas.bartle@hg17.btinternet.com@81.157.133.221 with login)
  by smtp804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 13:35:14 -0000
From: "Nick Bartle" <nicholas.bartle@btopenworld.com>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Installation Reports
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:35:52 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: AcTwz/o2KyM3YrZwSFyfRMChZO+Bsg==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1Cl5u5-0000Cl-00@spohr.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,
	MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 02 Jan 05 Debian Installer Release Candidate 2
from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-
businesscard.iso
uname -a: 
"Linux debian 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i586 Unkown"
Date: 02 Jan 05 1300hrs GMT
Method: Booted from Businesscard ISO and then http install

Machine: Built by http://www.timecomputers.com/	in the UK
Processor: AMD K6-2 366 Using an MSI 5182 Super Socket 7 Motherboard
Memory: 128MB PC133 SDRAM (2 x 64MB Sticks)
Root Device: IDE0  hda
Root Size/partition table: / = 9.9GB Ext3, Swap = 380MB
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Uknown as unable to finish install, installers shell (Ash) does not support
lspci command

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:    [E]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [E]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]

Comments/Problems:

This happens on 2.4 or 2.6 Install kernels with acpi on or off, using either
installer RC1 or RC2

Using Guided Partitioning failed every time, when formatting Root partition
it hung at 33%. When setting up partitions manually it failed formatting at
33% with "Failed to create a filesystem"
	To bypass this problem, I booted machine from Powerquest Partition
Magic 8 Boot floppies and set partitions up (Created & formatted). Then
started install again and installed onto the pre-existing partitions keeping
data and file system intact.
	After this it failed at 35% Installing the base system.




---------------------------------------
Received: (at 288205-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2005 18:05:01 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Mon Jan 03 10:05:01 2005
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from perrier.eu.org (kheops.homeunix.org) [81.56.227.253] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1ClWZg-0003xk-00; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:05:01 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBCD4F985
	for <288205-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon,  3 Jan 2005 19:04:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 20785-02 for <288205-done@bugs.debian.org>;
	Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:04:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3])
	by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D8B4F989
	for <288205-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon,  3 Jan 2005 19:04:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id CDA922329F; Mon,  3 Jan 2005 18:13:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:13:20 +0100
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: 288205-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#288205: Installation Reports
Message-ID: <20050103171320.GE6841@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <[🔎] 20050103075955.GN32004@gpm.stappers.nl> <[🔎] 20050103132350.5931.qmail@web86502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050103132350.5931.qmail@web86502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org
Delivered-To: 288205-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

>      You can close this bug report if you like, my machine is very old

Ditto...



Reply to: