Bug#137991: marked as done (Clarify apt upgrade issue in release notes, include on CDs)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:55:11 -0400
with message-id <20051013215511.GA30512@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing bugs in the old install-doc package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2002 12:24:22 +0000
>From firstname.lastname@example.org Tue Mar 12 06:24:22 2002
Received: from smtp.datacomm.ch (flu-smtp-01.datacomm.ch) [188.8.131.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16klKI-0004s7-00; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:24:22 -0600
Received: from tpo2.sourcepole (adsl-248-66-glattbrugg2.tiscalinet.ch [184.108.40.206])
by flu-smtp-01.datacomm.ch (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2CCOK623487;
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:24:20 +0100
Received: from tpo by tpo2.sourcepole with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16klJW-0000lK-00; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:23:34 +0100
From: Tomas Pospisek <email@example.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: boot-floppies: Documentation index contains bad URLs
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:23:34 +0100
Sender: Tomas Pospisek <email@example.com>
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-12
The main documentation index main/disks-*/current/doc/index.html has bad
link to the "Release Notes" (it currently links to
dists/testing/main/upgrade-i386/ which does not exist).
As of now the "Release Notes" seem to be solely residing at
* Please *do* copy them into the documentation section so they can be
included with the install mediums (there *are* "testing" CDs beeing
burned on a quite large scale everywhere) so that people that do only
upgrade through CDs etc. do have some infos on them on how to go about
* Please change the title "Release Notes" in the main index to
Upgrade Information and Release Notes.
I do have reports of people completely breaking their system (PCMCIA
was deinstalled, DHCP was deinstalled, leaving them without a means
to download the requiredpackages or without a means to go back) so
actually I wanted to report this bug as critical.
There were rumours on -devel that one absolutely needs to update apt
*first* before doing anything else when doing an upgrade from potato.
If this is critical then it absolutely needs to be properly documented
and the user *must* come accross that piece of information if he reads
the docu which AFAIK is not the case now.
* So please document that fact in:
In particular, if apt *does* need to be upgraded, then "3.3.1 Upgrading
from Pre-Potato Releases or Using CD-ROMs" is completely missleading
as one should (as far as I've heard from the rumours) *allways first
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel: Linux tpo2 2.4.16 #2 Fri Jan 4 18:17:17 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Received: (at 137991-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 21:55:13 +0000
>From firstname.lastname@example.org Thu Oct 13 14:55:13 2005
Received: from kitenet.net [220.127.116.11] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQB2e-0002SS-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:55:12 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (97-148-dial.xtn.net [18.104.22.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1A917F72;
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:55:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CF6D5BFA45; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:55:11 -0400
From: Joey Hess <email@example.com>
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Subject: closing bugs in the old install-doc package
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I'm closing these bugs because install-doc was the documentation for the
boot-floppies, which have reached end of life.
Current installation documentation is in the debian-installer-manual
package. If you think that your documentation issue is still not
adequately covered in the sarge installer manual, please reopen your bug
report and reassign it to debian-installer-manual.
see shy jo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----