[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 2.6.12 is in testing

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Which was a missing .udeb indeed, and quite bothersome. Not sure if it was
> introduced by a change in the hfsplus module, or by a change in d-i. That
> said, this is orthogonal to the issues discussed here. Also notice that if we
> had one-module-per-udeb and automated dependency handling, this would not have
> happened at all, so the argument cuts both way.

Any idea how one would handle loading a module x that depends on module
y being loaded first?  How is that currently handled?  Are the required
modules always included in the same udeb as the modules that depend on

Len Sorensen

Reply to: