[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: supporting sarge in the manual



Frans Pop wrote:
> I guess when the majority of changes in the manual is no longer relevant 
> for Sarge. IMO we have not yet reached that point.

We're getting close though.

> Nice.
> Does anything break if you just commit that patch for preseeding without 
> changing the example preseed file at the same time? AFAICT, it shouldn't.

No, it will keep working, but users won't know they can write some of
those lines in a non-gross fashion.

> I've been thinking of creating separate versions of the preseeding example 
> for Sarge and Etch and including the correct one at build time.
> This requires some changes in the build system though in order to still be 
> able to support translations.
> 
> This change would also make it possible to reduce branding in the manual.
> 
> I'll try to implement this before the end of the weekend. and then also 
> commit the patch you attached with the split of the preseeding examples.

Ok.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: