[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#247484: d-i and ntpdate



On Monday 25 July 2005 21:22, Joey Hess wrote:
> I welcome thoughts of suggestions on this matter..

Running ntpdate once during install should also be optional. Lots of 
people install Debian as a second OS and would not like d-i to mess with 
their hardware clock.

Running ntpdate also assumes quite a lot about network connectivity: is 
the port open; should a general ntp server be used or a local one (maybe 
DHCP can help there?).

Installing some kind of ntp service should be optional.
Also, personally I prefer chrony over ntp/ntpdate.

What about laptops that may not have networking at boot? You can setup ntp 
software to deal with that (chrony has a nice mechanism), but that would 
need to be done.

You are right there can be issues with ntp software: it often assumes a 
working RTC. At least for Sparc there is an issue with the RTC [1]. IIRC 
ntp was also affected.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301592

Attachment: pgpTqZwy6_fFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: