Bug#304973: missing NIC in moe
Geert Stappers wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:09:38PM +0200, Carlo Marashin wrote,
>in a different order:
>
>
>>Geert Stappers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hello Carlo,
>>>
>>>
>
>Hello again Carlo,
>
>
>
>>>On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:13:03PM +0200, Carlo Marashin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
> <snip/>
>
>
>
>>>>0000:01:07.0 Network controller: Compaq Computer Corporation Netelligent Integrated 10/100 TX UTP (rev 10)
>>>>0000:02:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 05)
>>>>0000:02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 05)
>>>>
>>>>
>
>Note the three NICs
>
>
>
>>>>0000:01:07.0 0280: 0e11:ae43 (rev 10)
>>>>0000:02:04.0 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 05)
>>>>0000:02:05.0 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 05)
>>>>
>>>>
>
> <snip/>
>
>
>
>>>>From install report #304002 I understood that there where some issues
>>>with NIC drivers.
>>>
>>>Do you see with to command `ifconfig` all three Network Interface Cards?
>>>
>>>
>
>Note the _three_
>
>
>
>>>(a simple 'yes' is enough.
>>>When it is a 'no' then attach the output of `ifconfig` )
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>moe:~# ifconfig -a
>>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:6A:CF:E8
>> BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0
>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>>
>>eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:8B:44:F1:39
>> inet addr:192.168.69.51 Bcast:192.168.69.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/248
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:12154 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:3752 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0
>> RX bytes:9279710 (8.8 MiB) TX bytes:285577 (278.8 KiB)
>>
>>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0
>> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
>> RX packets:287 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:287 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0
>> RX bytes:163584 (159.7 KiB) TX bytes:163584 (159.7 KiB)
>>
>>
>
>That are indeed _three_ interfaces,
>but only _two_ are from hardware ( "lo" is software )
>so one is still missing.
>And that makes the problem interresting.
>
>
>
>
>>Yes, with the 20050318 I can configure and see all NICs in any machine
>>I've tried so far and that includes a notebook as well...
>>
>>But not with releases after that...
>>
>>
>
>According http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/discover1-data.html
>there was a change on on march 21th and march 29th
>
>Your report #304002 learned me that you checked with
>a version from april 3th.
>
>If you do
>
> modprobe tlan
>
>see you then with `ifconfig -a` _three_ NICs ?
>
>
>
>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Carlo
>>
>>
>
>
>Cheers
>Geert Stappers
>
>P.S.
>Please reply below the text, thanks.
>
>
Humm...
I may have send you the ifconfig from the wrong machine... The one above
is from moe...
Here is the one from apu with 3 NICs... :-(
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:08:C7:09:23:21
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:5 Base address:0x2800
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:8B:6F:13:4C
inet addr:192.168.69.51 Bcast:192.168.69.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:238 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:106 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:2 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:23007 (22.4 KiB) TX bytes:14232 (13.8 KiB)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x3000 Memory:b7fff000-b7fff038
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:8B:6F:13:4D
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:15 Base address:0x3020 Memory:b7ffe000-b7ffe038
And I was checking the bug report that started this and the "lspci" are
from the 20050318 and not from the 20050403 since I did not manage to
get that far...
Reply to: