[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

selecting udebs for rc3



The timeline has us finishing udeb changes for rc3 by Monday, and
pushing all the rc3 udebs to sarge on March 2nd. So we need to decide
which of the udebs currently in sid need to reach sarge for rc3. I'm
using the http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/testing-summary.html to
keep track of these decisions, anyone can add annotations there.

In summary, the following udebs will not be updated for rc3:

cdebconf 0.74
	post sarge changes

linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 0.66
	Not yet used, post sarge.

localechooser 0.04
	post sarge

preseed
	post sarge

A decision still needs to be made on these:

base-installer 	1.13.3
	I'm still not clear on whether the chrp-rs6k 2.4 kernel change
	has been tested, and what other udeb/kernel package changes it
	depends on.

elilo-installer	1.3
	Probably safe but not strictly needed for rc3.

kbd-chooser 1.10
	This was supposed to fix usb keyboard problems on sparc, but
	seems not to. The Ukrainian keymap change is probably worth
	putting in.

languagechooser 1.45
	I'm a bit unsure of why we're adding so many new languages to
	this list at this point. Have installs with all these languages
	been tested?
	
net-retriever 1.03
	probably safe, but not needed

netcfg 1.08
	The 1.07.1 changes are ok for sure.
	I'm unsure about the 1.08 changes. Some nice things, some little
	bugfixes; is it well enough tested and worth the risk though?

os-prober 1.03
	We need at least the fix for the non-ascii boot.ini bug.
	There is some risk of breakage in the other changes; are they
	worth the risk?

partman-ext2r0 1.5
	Only some translation updates, AFAIK none are significant so I'm
	inclined not to include it, but could easily be overruled.

sibyl-installer 1.1
	Only some translation updates, AFAIK none are significant so I'm
	inclined not to include it, but could easily be overruled.

quik-installer 1.1
	Need advice/decision from Colin, Holger, etc.

silo-installer 1.00
	The vmlinuz.old fix is nice. The other changes are not RC.
	Is it worth the added risk? Since it's 23 days old with no new
	bugs, probably..

These need to be updated, but are not ready:

debootstrap
	Will need to be updated for the parted change, possibly other
	changes.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: