[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#222630: marked as done (ext2 is the wrong default for partconf/create-filesystem)



Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:27:35 -0800
with message-id <20040304082733.GA16077@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
and subject line no longer uses ext2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2003 15:24:29 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Mon Dec 01 09:24:27 2003
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AQpuU-0006Fu-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 09:24:26 -0600
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs5-222.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.222])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93EE17F36
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon,  1 Dec 2003 15:24:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EE0336EC16; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:43:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:43:54 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ext2 is the wrong default for partconf/create-filesystem
Message-ID: <20031201024354.GA22189@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 


--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: partconf
Severity: normal

Most users will want a journaling filesystem, and ext3 would be a good
choice for the default filesystem type, but the current default, ext2,
is not a very good choice. I suggest to s/2/3 in the Default field of
the partconf/create-filesystem template.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.22 #1 Sun Oct 12 15:11:10 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/yqrpd8HHehbQuO8RAllcAJwMkSS4VKCgw6Hf3SMuLQ3hqfRL3ACgm1ae
9+wZ4IiulMJliKaFE2fwty4=
=wjAb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 222630-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2004 08:27:41 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Thu Mar 04 00:27:41 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.82] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AyoCj-0003pa-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:27:41 -0800
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.195.135 with login)
  by smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2004 08:27:37 -0000
Received: from darjeeling (unknown [192.168.0.7])
	by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E71C2DEB0
	for <222630-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu,  4 Mar 2004 00:27:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AyoCd-0004BP-00
	for <222630-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:27:35 -0800
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:27:35 -0800
To: 222630-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: no longer uses ext2
Message-ID: <20040304082733.GA16077@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 222630-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 


--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

partconf no longer offers ext2 as a choice, so this bug is resolved.

--=20
Joshua Kwan

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
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=ryuR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--



Reply to: