Bug#285774: installation report (d-i fails on console-common_0.7.47_all.deb)
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 15/12/04 downloaded from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
and
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Wed Dec 1 19:43:08 JST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 15/12/04 16:00
Method: Downloaded ISO image of both netinstall and businesscard.
Burned images on CDR. Booted PC with those CDs. Got packages both
from CD (netinstall) and network (businesscard), both directly from the
net (ftp.ntua.gr through my company's proxy) and also from a local
apt-cacher repository.
Machine: OEM PC
Processor: Intel Celeron (Mendocino)
Memory: 46 MB
Root Device: IDE ATA (Seagate ST34321A)
Root Size/partition table: 2.0 GB on / with ext3 - no other partitions
Output of lspci and lspci -n: N/A (lspci not available from within d-i)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [ O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [E]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
Comments/Problems:
At 61% of the installation process, it dies with a red screen and
the message "The debootstrap program exited with an error
(return value 1)."
VT3 shows:
Unpacking iptables (from .../iptables_1.2.11-8_i386.deb) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/console-common_0.7.47_all.deb
umount: /target/dev/pts: Invalid argument
umount: /target/dev/shm: Invalid argument
umount: /target/proc/bus/usb: Invalid argument
The exact same thing happens when using the netinstall image (hence
reading packages off the CD, which I checked and it reports that its
integrity is OK) and the businesscard installer (hence, it fetches fresh
packages from the net.
Reply to: