Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/d-i/sarge-sarge.txt > > Nearly perfect. Is there a way to get amd64 added? Talk to jvw or get amd64 added to the archive. ;-) > Just to make sure I read this right: > > newer-source: libatk1.0-udeb/1.6.1-5[sparc]: build from atk1.0/1.6.1-5, but only newer 1.8.0-3 available > > A newer source has entered sarge but the udeb is still the old > version, right? Right. Most of these were updated today. > older-source: colo-udeb/1.14-1[mipsel]: build from colo/1.14-1, but only older 1.10-1 available > > The newer udeb has slipped into sarge but the deb and source are held > out for whatever reason, right? Correct (a hint was added to force this in today). -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature