Re: Udeb sources in sarge

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:

> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> what is the latest story on udeb sources for sarge? Is anyone working
>> on manually pushing them in?
>
> http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/d-i/sarge-sarge.txt

Nearly perfect. Is there a way to get amd64 added?

> Anything not listed there (most stuff) is in sync. A few udeb sources
> cannot be synced because the udeb accidentially entered sarge before the
> deb which is being helf out for whatever reason. In general I'm able to
> add udeb sources to sarge easily now.
>
> -- 
> see shy jo

Just to make sure I read this right:

newer-source: libatk1.0-udeb/1.6.1-5[sparc]: build from atk1.0/1.6.1-5, but only newer 1.8.0-3 available

A newer source has entered sarge but the udeb is still the old
version, right?


older-source: colo-udeb/1.14-1[mipsel]: build from colo/1.14-1, but only older 1.10-1 available

The newer udeb has slipped into sarge but the deb and source are held
out for whatever reason, right?

MfG
        Goswin