[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#284633: marked as done (Installation Report 2004-12-07 PowerPC)



Your message dated Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:48:12 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] 200412082148.12265.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#284633: Installation Report 2004-12-07 PowerPC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2004 16:07:15 +0000
>From artooro@gmail.com Tue Dec 07 08:07:15 2004
Return-path: <artooro@gmail.com>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cbhrv-0006Ek-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:07:15 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so285508rna
        for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:07:14 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=cgSEZodQwZq3PWn3sSrM1936hJI5ObQcGhOjD7jKptMT69WD7ERSoQRvmVu/iusvNWpzlL0C9ohKWvltJG5rkPOkkqfZMrzN/17LnqoW8WtkeBqY9HW33hjMsxaq0jot1CPAMrqPrUcy/43QimXVbGWw/QFcUNz4LHNeLtKIMNg=
Received: by 10.38.72.79 with SMTP id u79mr1180300rna;
        Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.149.54 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[🔎] ca3422f10412070807296ab5b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:07:14 -0500
From: Arthur Wiebe <artooro@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Arthur Wiebe <artooro@gmail.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installation Report 2004-12-07 PowerPC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-11-22
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.9-powerpc #1 Thu Oct 28 14:04:28 CEST 2004
ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-12-04
Method: Using the netinst CD image, with Debian base. Installed the
base system, exited base-config at configure apt, configured PPPoE,
and then finished configuring the base system.

Machine: iMac G4
Processor: 1 GHZ PowerPC 7455
Memory: 256 MB DDR
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda
        #                    type name                  length   base 
    ( size )  system
/dev/hda1     Apple_partition_map Apple                     63 @ 1    
    ( 31.5k)  Partition map
/dev/hda2         Apple_Bootstrap untitled                1954 @ 64   
    (977.0k)  NewWorld bootblock
/dev/hda3               Apple_HFS Mac OS X           110038232 @
46263248  ( 52.5G)  HFS
/dev/hda4         Apple_UNIX_SVR2 untitled            44759766 @ 2018 
    ( 21.3G)  Linux native
/dev/hda5         Apple_UNIX_SVR2 swap                 1501464 @
44761784  (733.1M)  Linux swap
/dev/hda6              Apple_Free Extra                      8 @
156301480 (  4.0k)  Free space

Block size=512, Number of Blocks=156301488
DeviceType=0x0, DeviceId=0x0
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 AGP
0000:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown
device 0189 (rev a2)
0001:10:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 PCI
0001:10:17.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid Mac I/O
0001:10:18.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB
0001:10:19.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB
0001:10:1a.0 USB Controller: Apple Computer Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB
0001:10:1b.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
0001:10:1b.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
0001:10:1b.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04)
0002:20:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 Internal PCI
0002:20:0d.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth/Intrepid ATA/100
0002:20:0e.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2
FireWire (rev 81)
0002:20:0f.0 Ethernet controller: Apple Computer Inc. UniNorth 2 GMAC
(Sun GEM) (rev 80)

0000:00:0b.0 0600: 106b:0034
0000:00:10.0 0300: 10de:0189 (rev a2)
0001:10:0b.0 0600: 106b:0035
0001:10:17.0 ff00: 106b:003e
0001:10:18.0 0c03: 106b:003f
0001:10:19.0 0c03: 106b:003f
0001:10:1a.0 0c03: 106b:003f
0001:10:1b.0 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 43)
0001:10:1b.1 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 43)
0001:10:1b.2 0c03: 1033:00e0 (rev 04)
0002:20:0b.0 0600: 106b:0036
0002:20:0d.0 ff00: 106b:003b
0002:20:0e.0 0c00: 106b:0031 (rev 81)
0002:20:0f.0 0200: 106b:0032 (rev 80)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [E]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:
Configuring the network did not work because I can only connect using
PPPoE. It resulted in an error.

The installation went good and smooth. Something I would like to see
is to be able to configuring a PPPoE (ADSL) connection before
base-config or in base-config before it's time to configure apt.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 284633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2004 20:48:43 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Wed Dec 08 12:48:43 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cc8jq-0001u2-00; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 12:48:43 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
	by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Cc8jJ-0002cv-00; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 21:48:09 +0100
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: Arthur Wiebe <artooro@gmail.com>,
 284633-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#284633: Installation Report 2004-12-07 PowerPC
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:48:12 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[🔎] ca3422f10412070807296ab5b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] ca3422f10412070807296ab5b@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200412082148.12265.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 284633-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tuesday 07 December 2004 17:07, Arthur Wiebe wrote:
> Configuring the network did not work because I can only connect using
> PPPoE. It resulted in an error.

That's more or less as expected then.

> The installation went good and smooth. Something I would like to see
> is to be able to configuring a PPPoE (ADSL) connection before
> base-config or in base-config before it's time to configure apt.

You can do by switching to VT2 and configuring PPPoE manually before 
apt-configure is run.

There are more people that would like PPPoE support in the installer. 
However, nobody who actually has PPPoE seems interested in working / able 
to work on it.

Closing this installation report as there were no real problems.
Thank you for submitting the report.

Cheers,
FJP



Reply to: