[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: partman problems (sparc and elsewhere)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Blars Blarson wrote:
| After doing successful installs using rc2 on a stack of sparc systems
| (ultra1, ultra1e, ultra2, ultra2) I started playing with raid and lvm
| installs.  Unfortunatly, the raid and lvm stuff failed due to bugs in
| partman and missing modules.

What missing modules?

md-modules-2.4.27-1-sparc32-di |       0.61 |       testing | sparc
md-modules-2.4.27-1-sparc32-di |       0.61 |      unstable | sparc
md-modules-2.4.27-1-sparc64-di |       0.61 |       testing | sparc
md-modules-2.4.27-1-sparc64-di |       0.61 |      unstable | sparc
md-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di |       0.02 |       testing | sparc
md-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc32-di |       0.02 |      unstable | sparc
md-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di |       0.02 |       testing | sparc
md-modules-2.6.8-1-sparc64-di |       0.02 |      unstable | sparc

And they're all full of the right stuff, or so it seems.

If whatever you need requires kernel config changes, speak NOW, because
I'm already rebuilding new sparc images to add dmfe.ko for Netras and
Fires and if possible I want to get them out before next dinstall.

- --
Joshua Kwan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=91g0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: