[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#282763: Installation report amd64 (gcc-3.4)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: svn #23974
uname -a: 2.6.9-1 amd64 k8
Date: 11/24/2004
Method: converted monolithic iso image into an USB image,
boot via "expert", network install, no proxy

Machine: Shuttle SN85G4V2
Processor: amd64 3200+ (Newcastle)
Memory: 1GB
Root Device: sata_sil
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

~   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *           1         487     3911796   83  Linux                 /
/dev/sda2             488        1461     7823655   83  Linux
/dev/sda3            1462        1705     1959930   82  Linux swap / Solaris  swap
/dev/sda4            1706       19457   142592940    5  Extended
/dev/sda5            1706        9001    58605088+  83  Linux
/dev/sda6            9002       19457    83987788+  83  Linux

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
no pci problem

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [E]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:

After manually partition the disk there was a popup saying

	Partition disks:
	No EFI partition was found

Ignored. The rest of the installation went fine.


Regards

Harri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBpGSQUTlbRTxpHjcRArFsAJ0X0ZUM8guRv2qNxHIccH4fIsbSWACggN6n
y6Auw8ofnxf8EDtgd6wYOd4=
=ybR4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: