Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed
At Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:41:56 -0500,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > Machine: AMD64, 1GB memory, 130GB P-ATA HDD, RTL8169 NIC, IEEE1394,
> > GeForceFX5200 SVGA.
> Were you installing debian unstable i386 on this amd64? I can't tell
> from your report.
Oops, sorry. I installed 'testing' i386.
> > The problem is caused by OpenOffice.org dependency problem:
> > Hmm, I remember joeyh removed openoffice from desktop selection, but
> > tasksel/tasks/desktop in svn remains:
> > # openoffice is the best word processor / office suite at the moment
> > openoffice.org-bin
> I never removed all of openoffice.org from the desktop task. I don't see
> any depenency problems with installs of the desktop task on testing or
> unstable, either.
Hmm, that's strange. I'll try again on another machine.
> > If we want to have openoffice.org, we should have -l10n- packages.
> > If we don't want to have -l10n- packages, openoffice.org should be
> > removed.
> I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Well, do we have OpenOffice.org for desktop selection finally?
If so, will we revert l10n packages when OOo is ready for Sarge?
# commented out for reason explained in changelog 2.11