[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#279369: [after sarge] should use lvs and pvs

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: lvmcfg
> Severity: wishlist
> Currently, lvmcfg uses the LVM tools aimed at humans.  However, there
> are tools (lvs, pvs) which generate output which is much easier to
> parse automatically, and you can usually specify exactly what data you
> want to see.  lvmcfg should use these tools.

Maybe partman-auto-lvm should too, I know it has some pretty ugly things
in there to get info from lvm.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: