[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#277046: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)



Your message dated Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:01:14 +0200
with message-id <200410181201.14658.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#277046: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 07:22:16 +0000
>From gbv@oxixares.com Mon Oct 18 00:22:16 2004
Return-path: <gbv@oxixares.com>
Received: from 161.red-217-127-2.pooles.rima-tde.net (gauss.oxixares.com) [217.127.2.161] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CJRqR-0003kb-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:22:16 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gauss.oxixares.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF3F8E99D
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:21:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gauss.oxixares.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (gauss [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 16816-06 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
 Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:21:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from www.oxixares.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by gauss.oxixares.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128AA8E8E2
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:21:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 193.144.147.23 (proxying for 192.168.54.158)
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user gbv);
        by www.oxixares.com with HTTP;
        Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:21:41 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[🔎] 48044.193.144.147.23.1098084101.squirrel@193.144.147.23>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:21:41 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Package: installation-reports
From: "Guillermo Ballester Valor" <gbv@oxixares.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at oxixares.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: RC1 2004/08/01
uname -a:
Date: 17/10/2004
Method: Net Installation, using diskettes (floppy).
No proxy

Machine: Old clone PC
Processor: Pentium 166 MMX
Memory: 64 Mb
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: 12.8 GB
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Base System Installation Checklist:
[E] =3D Error (please elaborate below)

Initial boot worked:    [YES]
Configure network HW:   [YES]
Config network:         [YES]
Detect CD:              [NO well, but is my fault. CD reader is not OK]
Load installer modules: [YES]
Detect hard drives:     [YES]
Partition hard drives:  [NO, PROBLEMS SEE BELOW]
Create file systems:    [NO ]
Mount partitions:       [ ]
Install base system:    [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]

Comments/Problems:

All gone well upto the partition task. It detected the former partition
table and format. But then I detected some problems.

1) It couldn't mount the ext3 primary partition mounted at /. So
installation didn't work. In a further try I could install on ext2 but
NOT in ext3 format. It seems something weird in mounting ext3 partitions


2) Doing manual set for partitions, it cannot be set EXT3 partition (ther=
e
are not such posibitity in the menu).

Guillermo

--=20
Guillermo Ballester Valor (gbv)
Ogijares, Granada =A0SPAIN
http://www.oxixares.com/~gbv/
Linux user #117181. See http://counter.li.org/
Public GPG KEY http://www.oxixares.com/~gbv/pubgpg.html



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277046-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 10:01:49 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Mon Oct 18 03:01:49 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CJUKr-00029S-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:01:49 -0700
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
	by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CJUKI-0006Ln-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:01:14 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: "Guillermo Ballester Valor" <gbv@oxixares.com>,
 277046-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#277046: Package: installation-reports
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:01:14 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[🔎] 48044.193.144.147.23.1098084101.squirrel@193.144.147.23>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 48044.193.144.147.23.1098084101.squirrel@193.144.147.23>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200410181201.14658.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 277046-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On Monday 18 October 2004 09:21, Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: RC1 2004/08/01

Version RC1 of the installer is no longer supported because of a change in 
the kernels used in the installer.
Using RC1 will result in the problems you described.

Please try again using the pre-RC2 release of the installer from:
http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

I am closing this bug. Feel free submit a new installation report with the 
results with pre-RC2.

Cheers,
FJP



Reply to: