[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#265407: marked as done (crash in Debian Installer release Candidate 1)



Your message dated Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:44:12 -0400
with message-id <20041014054412.GA2978@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2004 00:38:10 +0000
>From pluron@videotron.ca Thu Aug 12 17:38:10 2004
Return-path: <pluron@videotron.ca>
Received: from relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BvQ5C-0002PS-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:38:10 -0700
Received: from videotron.ca ([24.201.105.252]) by VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
 with ESMTP id <0I2D00IDK0FL7U@VL-MO-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for
 submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:38:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:38:12 -0400
From: pluron@videotron.ca
Subject: crash in Debian Installer release Candidate 1
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Message-id: <411BE344.3060806@videotron.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: Debian Installer release candidate 1
  
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
Date: Aug 11,2004
Method: How did you install? burnt installer and proceed with netinstall
        What did you boot off?  Booted from harddisk
        If network install, from where?  Proxied?

Machine: Asus
Processor: Pentium IV
Memory: 1Gig
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: 15Gig
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E] (see bug below)
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:

-CRASH/REBOOT: After Base was installe, system rebooted fine. Entered 
root password, at new user account creation entered username, after 
entering the newuser password the second time to confirm new user 
password, pressed enter key and then the PC rebooted immediately without 
any message. Netinstall beta 4 was working fine, netinstaller release 
candidate 1 is broken.

-BUG: Didn't want to install grub, so answered "NO" at grub installation 
but was then prompted to enter device name where to install grub. After 
trying to answer fd0 (as indicated as one possibility) installation of 
grub failed with "unable to install grub in /dev/fd0". It's strange that 
it still asked where to install grub in first place as even when you say 
you don't want grub it ask you where to install it.

thanks for you work.

Install logs and other status info is available in 
/var/log/debian-installer/.
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to submit@bugs.debian.org.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265407-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 20:24:08 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Thu Oct 14 13:24:07 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CIC8t-0005kf-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:24:07 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3EC17E97
	for <265407-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:46:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4A7186E60B; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:44:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:44:12 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 265407-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing report
Message-ID: <20041014054412.GA2978@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 265407-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Both problems mentioned in this report are now fixed.

--=20
see shy jo

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBbhIsd8HHehbQuO8RAgfoAJ46WtLba3VVIVRet0/EVlWOxUvUeACgq02r
S4BOGifwC3DK1UNa9iW2TiE=
=3DqM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--



Reply to: