[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#247506: marked as done ([i386] [beta4] [netinst] eval syntax error during debootstrap)



Your message dated Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:16:30 +0200
with message-id <200410071116.30484.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#247506:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 14:55:46 +0000
>From michelangelo79@libero.it Wed May 05 07:55:46 2004
Return-path: <michelangelo79@libero.it>
Received: from smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.127] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BLNoI-0007ut-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 07:55:46 -0700
Received: from libero.it (172.16.1.20) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01)
        id 404F14900074E293 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 5 May 2004 16:55:15 +0200
Date: Wed,  5 May 2004 16:55:14 +0200
Message-Id: <HX8XG2$A53C5E3868AE44C369787F3A04E648DF@libero.it>
Subject: installation-reports
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sensitivity: 3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "michelangelo79\@libero\.it" <michelangelo79@libero.it>
To: "submit" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.1 (B27)
X-type: 0
X-SenderIP: 82.51.6.107
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: installation-reports 
 
Debian-installer-version: 05-05-2004 =0D
=
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ 110 Mb Image. (first, shoul=
d be 
beta4) 
 
uname -a: Linux mulder 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:3=
8:08 EST 2004 i686 
unknown 
 
Date: 05-05-2004 15:30 
 
Method: I j=
ust burned and booted with just burned cd; problems starts before 
using=
 net connection, so I believe it is not important to know that I tried =0D
=
installation in a machine connected via eth0 to another machine which is =

connected to the internet and in which there are working iptable rooles=
. (by 
the way I told it) :)  
 
 
Machine: Home asembled 
 
Proces=
sor: Intel Celeron Mendocino 300@450 
 
Memory: 128 Mb 
 
Root Device=
: IDE hdb 
 
Root Size/partition table: I have got 2 Hd on that machine=
: hda (4 Gb) 
contains just a windows fat32 partition in which there is =
win98. Hdb (8 Gb) 
has been partitioned by debian-installer and after pa=
rtitioning it contains a 
huge ext3 partition (more than 7 Gb) and a sma=
ll swap partition (about 500 Mb) 
The ext3 partition is primary one. =0D
=
 
Output of lspci: How can I do lspci while the OS is not yet installed?=
  
By the way I have a ATI Radeon 7000 graphic card, an ethernet control=
ler Intel 
Corpo Ethernet pro 100 and a Creative Sound Blaster 64. Plus =
usb microsoft 
optical mouse. 
 
Base System Installation Checklist: =0D
=
 
Initial boot worked:    [O] 
Configure network HW:   [O] 
Config net=
work:         [O] 
Detect CD:              [O] 
Load installer modules:=
 [O] 
Detect hard drives:     [O] 
Partition hard drives:  [O] 
Create=
 file systems:    [O] 
Mount partitions:       [O] 
Install base system=
:    [E] 
Install boot loader:    [ ] 
Reboot:                 [ ] 
[O=
] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it =0D
=
 
Comments/Problems: 
 
Blue background, "installation of base system"=
 
 
The bar stay at 0%, and after a while the background become red and=
 I got 2 
error messages: 
 
debootstrap has ended with an error (rest=
itued value 2). 
Check /var/log/messages or look the virtual terminal n,=
 3 for details 
 
Installation of base system in /target/ was a failure=
 
Check /var/log/messages or look the virtual terminal n, 3 for details =

 
on third terminal i have: 
 
pvscan -- LVM driver/module not loade=
d? 
 
vgscan -- LVM driver/module not loaded? 
 
modprobe: failed to =
load module floppy 
eval: 3: Syntax error: newline unexpected (expecting=
 ")") 
 
May be it can be useful: my mobo lithium battery is to be repl=
aced. 
 
Sorry for bad english! Italy here! 
Thanks  
 
Michelangelo=
 


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 247506-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2004 09:17:00 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Thu Oct 07 02:17:00 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CFUOS-0004Ba-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 02:17:00 -0700
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
	by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CFUNx-0002YL-00
	for <247506-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:16:29 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: 247506-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#247506:
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:16:30 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[🔎] 000001c4ac47$fa9a05b0$9300000a@ogd.local>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 000001c4ac47$fa9a05b0$9300000a@ogd.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200410071116.30484.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 247506-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Closing as user reports problem fixed in pre-rc2.

Thanks for following up on the report.
Please feel free to submit a new installation report with any findings from an 
installation with pre-rc2.

--
Cheers,
FJP



Reply to: