[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: plans for d-i rc2 (and Oldenburg meeting)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 18 September 2004 16:13, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 18 September 2004 02:07, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Which alternative is better, I leave up to you -- and the
> > timetables of the release managers.

I hope it'll be: RC2 immediatly after Oldenburg.

> My feeling is we should focus on the release, not new features.

Same here, although I'd absolutely love to see raid-on-root finished.

[ snip ]
>
> For Oldenburg I would propose to work on the major problems that are
> still there (like old-world Mac's, the boot-2 floppy) and on
> preparing the release (like deciding which translations to include).
>
> I also think that having people together in Oldenburg and being able
> to quickly ask if a certain para in the manual is still valid or
> should be removed and what new arch-specific information maybe should
> be included, could really give a boost to the manual.
>
> Personally, I also plan to work on the possibility of using .po files
> for manual translation and building ps/pdf/txt versions of the
> manual.

I also plan to work mostly with translation, since I'm not a very 
skilled programmer. I will begin (and hopefully complete) translation 
of the Sarge Installation Manual to Danish. Furthermore, I expect to go 
over the Danish translation of d-i and send patches where needed.

[ snip ]

I'll bring a couple of x86 and non-x86 machines for testing purposes.
Looking forward to meeting all of you. 

B/R,
- -- 
Frederik Dannemare | mailto:frederik@dannemare.net
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A  F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBTd5KLSX61ZxOtagRAgSSAJ9pPXGaqmo4mlSCytEJg/wqyDwglgCeLA9E
KPriwm/mjY/o4xqBz49x6r4=
=DXhI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: