[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Parted still fails to see partitions - Was: Bug#269036 not fixed in parted 1.6.11



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Kraai [mailto:kraai@ftbfs.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:36 PM
> To: Zenker, Matthias (Otometrics Stuttgart)
> Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Parted still fails to see partitions - Was: 
> Bug#269036 not fixed in parted 1.6.11
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:10:42PM +0200, 
> mzenker@gnotometrics.de wrote:
> > Disk /dev/discs/disc0/disc: 36.3 GB, 36344161280 bytes
> > 240 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4694 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 = 7741440 bytes
> > 
> >                 Device Boot      Start         End      
> Blocks   Id  System
> > /dev/discs/disc0/part1   *           1        2349    
> 17758408+   7  HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/discs/disc0/part2            4695        5168     
> 3583440   41  PPC PReP Boot
> > /dev/discs/disc0/part3            2350        3321     
> 7348320    c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> > /dev/discs/disc0/part4            3322        4694    
> 10379880    5  Extended
> > /dev/discs/disc0/part5            3738        3805      
> 514080   82  Linux swap
> > /dev/discs/disc0/part6            3806        4694     
> 6720808+  83  Linux
> > /dev/discs/disc0/part7            3322        3737     
> 3144928+  83  Linux
> > 
> > Partition table entries are not in disk order
> > 
> > * parted says:
> > 
> > GNU Parted 1.6.11 with HFS shrink patch 12.5
> > [...]
> > Using /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
> >                                                             
>               
> > Error: Can't have a partition outside the disk!
> 
> This error occurs if parted detects that a partition starts 
> before the start of the disk or ends beyond its end.
> 
> The fdisk output you posted indicates that partition 2 does 
> so. Could you delete it using fdisk and then retry?

I won't delete it, because it is a protected/hidden partition containing the WIN XP installation disk, and I still need it. That is the way IBM Thinkpads are configured. The funny thing is that SUSE 9.0 (kernel 2.4) which uses libparted AFAIK, did not have any problem with that hidden partition.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/08/msg03147.html and following for more details about this machine...

Matthias

--------------------------------------------
GN Otometrics -- Hortmann	
Dipl.Phys. Dr. Matthias Zenker
Entwicklung / Development
Auchtertstraße 4, D-72770 Reutlingen
Tel. ++49(0)7121/99435-60, Fax -79
eMail: mzenker at gnotometrics dot de
http://www.hortmann.de		



Reply to: