[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#267677: marked as done ([RC1] Success: i386, root on LVM, in spite of complaint from d-i)



Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:16:18 -0400
with message-id <20040831181618.GA7427@kitenet.net>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2004 21:11:08 +0000
>From minghua@rice.edu Mon Aug 23 14:11:08 2004
Return-path: <minghua@rice.edu>
Received: from handler9.mail.rice.edu [128.42.58.209] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BzM5s-0004NW-00; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:11:08 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by handler9.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 560B91DB09; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:11:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by handler9.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2BBDA1DB08; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:11:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from handler9.mail.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (handler9.mail.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 27203-02; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:11:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hexagon.mems.rice.edu (hexagon.mems.rice.edu [128.42.57.178])
	by handler9.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3C3431DB0D; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:11:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from minghua by hexagon.mems.rice.edu with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BzMBd-00021r-00; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:17:05 -0500
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:17:05 -0500
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: minghua@rice.edu
Subject: [RC1] Success: i386, root on LVM, in spite of complaint from d-i
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040823211705.GA7792@hexagon.mems.rice.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Ming Hua <minghua@rice.edu>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030616-p6 at mail.rice.edu
X-DCC--Metrics: handler9.mail.rice.edu 1067; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

Hi,

Today I've finished an installation on i386 with root on LVM, using RC1
businesscard CD.  I had only one IDE hard drive, and made two partitions
-- /dev/hda1 as /boot, and /dev/hda2 as the LVM volume group.  The whole
partition process and LVM configuration is done in partman, and goes
very smoothly.  I booted with linux26 so the kernel I got in the end is
2.6.7, which works quite well in my limited testing.

The only problem I see is that after my LVM configuration, there is an
dialog warning that LVM won't work with /boot or / on LVM.  I proceeded
anyway and installed GRUB on mbr, which boots just fine.  Am I just
lucky to get this work, or d-i already supports root on LVM (at least
for 2.6 kernel)?  If yes, this warning dialog should be changed.  (I am
also curious about /boot on LVM, is that possible with the current
kernel Debian ships?)

Thanks for the wonderful work,
Ming
2004.08.23

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics is much too hard for physicists.                 --- David Hilbert
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 267677-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 18:16:48 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Aug 31 11:16:48 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C2DBY-0001MY-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:16:48 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169D8186F8
	for <267677-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:15:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9A5166E2EA; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:16:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:16:18 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 267677-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 23
Message-ID: <20040831181618.GA7427@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] E1C2CxV-0003Hq-00@newraff.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1C2CxV-0003Hq-00@newraff.debian.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Delivered-To: 267677-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Joey Hess wrote:
> tag 267677 + fixed
>=20
> quit
>=20
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:18:57 -0400
> Source: partman-lvm
> Binary: partman-lvm
> Architecture: source all
> Version: 23
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
> Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
> Description:=20
>  partman-lvm - Add to partman support for LVM (udeb)
> Closes: 267677
> Changes:=20
>  partman-lvm (23) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
>  .
>    * Joey Hess
>      - Remove the warning about root or /boot on LVM. Debian supports thi=
s, for
>        at least some kernels and initrds now (tested i386 2.6 with / LVM,
>        success), and lilo-installer will automatically be run.
>        Closes: #267677
> Files:=20
>  643f3d16e09816ecb547ce8fea74f225 626 debian-installer standard partman-l=
vm_23.dsc
>  d592a2eb1b1f6d93e801d16ff8ea33b8 33728 debian-installer standard partman=
-lvm_23.tar.gz
>  c6b5548bbb3f71ddfd0cc4c84e4368b2 17136 debian-installer standard partman=
-lvm_23_all.udeb
> package-type: udeb
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
>=20
> iD8DBQFBNLtj2tp5zXiKP0wRAj/pAKCJgsBVN8HrsMXj32iQC9uYexkAlACgu0Ke
> s9r0V/cLY35A7fmyGI8po5w=3D
> =3D0NNR
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>=20

--=20
see shy jo

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBNMBxd8HHehbQuO8RApkMAKCGwi85CGbmC0Fw/f5XESkGNzePsQCgpj/Z
PqMPZwCMnjFimjY7AJq7d5c=
=XeCW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--



Reply to: