[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#267677: [RC1] Success: i386, root on LVM, in spite of complaint from d-i



Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> [2004-08-27 14:26]:
> > > I suspect the only (remaining?) problem with LVM is putting /boot on
> > > lvm, which probably still does not work with grub. Apparently the initrd
> > > problems are fixed, so we should indeed change that test to only
> > > complain if /boot is on LVM (or root, if there is no separate /boot
> > > partition). Martin, does this seem right to you?
> > 
> > Yes, the initrd problems for both LVM and RAID have been fixed a long
> > time ago; both should work with separate /boot partition.
> > Unfortunately, I cannot test because I had to return my test laptop.
> 
> I've tried several times to get root on lvm working, but on boot of the
> installed system, I always see:
> 
>  No volume groups found
> 
> And then a kernel panic as it fails to pivot_root into the root
> filesystem.

Tried some more, and I always get the above failure with 2.4, but root
on LVM works fine with 2.6. I wonder what's going on?

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: