Bug#249677: marked as done (FQDN default for host name -> menu loop)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:14:36 -0400
with message-id <20040812201434.2348772159.qww314159@soup>
and subject line this bug is fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2004 19:40:02 +0000
>From ejb@apexcovantage.com Tue May 18 12:40:02 2004
Return-path: <ejb@apexcovantage.com>
Received: from through.apexcovantage.com (through.acv.apexcovantage.com) [65.166.131.3]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BQARW-0005ph-00; Tue, 18 May 2004 12:40:02 -0700
Received: from apex.acv.apexcovantage.com (apex.acv.apexcovantage.com [192.168.0.1])
by through.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/apexcovantage-gateway-1.0) with ESMTP id i4IJdsbc019528
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 15:39:55 -0400
Received: from soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (soup.acv.apexcovantage.com [192.168.0.5])
by apex.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/ads-apexcovantage-hub-1.1.b1) with ESMTP id i4IJdraP022650;
Tue, 18 May 2004 15:39:53 -0400
Received: from soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i4IJdr4v011589;
Tue, 18 May 2004 15:39:53 -0400
Received: (from ejb@localhost)
by soup.acv.apexcovantage.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i4IJdrWk011585;
Tue, 18 May 2004 15:39:53 -0400
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:39:53 -0400
Message-Id: <200405181939.i4IJdrWk011585@soup.acv.apexcovantage.com>
From: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: ejb@ql.org
Subject: FQDN default for host name -> menu loop
X-Apex-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by Apex with MailScanner
X-Apex-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: ejb@apexcovantage.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040517/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
I started an installation using this image, but ended up going back to
beta 4, so I don't have a complete installation report. There was no
DHCP client available (reported separately against the businesscard
ISO as well), so I did a static installation. After confirming
that the IP address settings were correct, d-i prompted for a host
name, defaulting to the fully qualified name that DNS provided for the
IP address. If I just hit return at that point, I am sent back to
confirming my network settings. Hitting return just pops back and
forth between these two screens. To break out of this, I removed
everything after the first . in the host name and was sent to select
the domain name which had a correct default value.
Debian-installer should probably take just the first component of the
hostname that it gets back from DNS when creating a default answer to
the hostname question, or else it should either ignore the domain name
or give a meaningful error message.
--
Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
http://www.ql.org/q/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 249677-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2004 00:15:15 +0000
>From ejb@ql.org Thu Aug 12 17:15:15 2004
Return-path: <ejb@ql.org>
Received: from lakermmtao06.cox.net [68.230.240.33]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BvPj0-0007N8-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:15:14 -0700
Received: from gwendolyn.in.ql.org ([68.100.32.28]) by lakermmtao06.cox.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709)
with ESMTP
id <20040813001438.BLSI4081.lakermmtao06.cox.net@gwendolyn.in.ql.org>
for <249677-done@bugs.debian.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:14:38 -0400
Received: from soup.in.ql.org (soup.in.ql.org [10.160.59.17])
by gwendolyn.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-1) with ESMTP id i7D0EdQV025571
for <249677-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:14:39 -0400
Received: from soup.in.ql.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i7D0EaNx024467;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:14:36 -0400
Received: (from ejb@localhost)
by soup.in.ql.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i7D0EaOt024463;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:14:36 -0400
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:14:36 -0400
From: Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
To: 249677-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: this bug is fixed
Message-ID: <20040812201434.2348772159.qww314159@soup>
Delivered-To: 249677-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
I retested this case in the current test candidate for
debian-installer and am pleased to say that the bug has been fixed.
As submitter, I am closing this bug.
--
Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org>
http://www.ql.org/q/
Reply to: