Bug#262714: (no subject)
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040728/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux linux 2.4.19-4GB #6 Fri Feb 28 21:14:58 MST 2003 i686 unknown (SuSE 8.1->sarge)
Date: 2004-07-28 22:15
Method: netinst CD, boot from CD, unproxied network install
Machine: HP OmniBook 6000
Processor:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 547.629
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips : 1091.17
Memory:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 256100 101744 154356 0 10160 64408
-/+ buffers/cache: 27176 228924
Swap: 529192 0 529192
Root Device: /dev/hda, /dev/hdb=cd
Root Size/partition table:
(BEFORE INSTALL)
Disk /dev/hda: 240 heads, 63 sectors, 2343 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 1 444 3356608+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/hda2 445 514 529200 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda3 515 584 529200 83 Linux
/dev/hda4 585 2343 13298040 f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 585 862 2101648+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/hda6 863 1140 2101648+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/hda7 1141 1418 2101648+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/hda8 1419 1835 3152488+ 8e Linux LVM
/dev/hda9 1836 2343 3840448+ 8e Linux LVM
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 03)
00:07.0 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 03)
00:0a.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
00:0a.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1420
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c556 Hurricane CardBus (rev 10)
00:0b.1 Communication controller: 3Com Corporation Mini PCI 56k Winmodem (rev 10)
00:0d.0 Multimedia audio controller: ESS Technology ES1983S Maestro-3i PCI Audio Accelerator
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [E]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I downloaded the http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ i386 image first, but kept
getting 'Loading isolinux: Disk error 29, AX=420E, drive 9F' errors. Then I noticed I was only
pulling 10Mb. I switched to
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040728/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
after that and the rest of this install report is for the 20040728 iso.
I was replacing a previous SuSE 8.1 notebook with debian sarge. I prefer to use LVM (one
of the reasons I had been running SuSE), and typically make the Volume Group called 'system'.
I went through the repartitioning by first removing all the partitions, then adding back in a
root, swap, and two LVM physical volumes. When it came time to declare a volume group however,
the name system failed. The error messgages on the third console suggest the issue being that
the system booted and detected the original 'system', and refused to creat another
"A volume group called 'system' alread exists."
I'm not sure if I would have experienced this error had I *first* deleted the volume group and
*then* repartitioned the drive. I'm afraid it is too late to try that now since the drive is
already repartitioned. I worked around this be simply calling my Volume Group 'sys'.
This is my third use of the installer for LVM and things keep getting smoother. I'm not sure if
you've fixed things in the LVM logic or perhaps I'm just becoming more experienced with it -
but its PROGRESS!
Thanks for all your efforts.
Reply to: