Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?
From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:23:57 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040723172357.GO965@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1090602180.16509.26.camel@dev-linux.fsf.net>
References: <[🔎] 1090602180.16509.26.camel@dev-linux.fsf.net>

Adam Thornton wrote:
> The /etc/fstab written for S/390 assumes old-style, static /dev entries:
> /dev/dasda1, /dev/dasdb1, and so on.
> 
> Unfortunately, the installed system does not have those device nodes,
> but instead has devfs: /dev/dasd/<address>/part1, etc.

AFAICS the installed system shouldn't mount devfs. It also should have
static /dev entries, managed by makedev.


Thiemo

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?
  - From: Adam Thornton <athornton@sinenomine.net>

References:
- /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?
  - From: Adam Thornton <athornton@sinenomine.net>

Prev by Date: Re: umount: /initrd/dev: Invalid argument
Next by Date: Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?
Previous by thread: Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?
Next by thread: Re: /etc/fstab problem on S/390: which package? Userdevfs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread