Bug#260655: marked as done (debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails for ./README.html)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:23:10 -0400
with message-id <20040721172310.GE19623@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#260655: debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails for ./README.html
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 15:10:47 +0000
>From evan@bad.dynu.ca Wed Jul 21 08:10:47 2004
Return-path: <evan@bad.dynu.ca>
Received: from (bad.dynu.ca) [132.216.183.27]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BnIk3-0003Bk-00; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:10:47 -0700
Received: by bad.dynu.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 38CED278039; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Debian User <evan@bad.dynu.ca>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails for ./README.html
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:10:17 -0400
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20040721151017.38CED278039@bad.dynu.ca>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Mounting the sarge netinst beta 4 .iso (on loopback), cd'ing to that dir, and running:
md5sum -c md5sums.txt
Gives an error. README.html has the wrong md5sum... assumably because it was
edited after the checksums were generated.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 260655-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 18:33:53 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Wed Jul 21 11:33:53 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from (dragon.kitenet.net) [66.168.94.147]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BnLub-0001CJ-00; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:33:53 -0700
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 31DDC6E8C4; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:23:10 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 260655-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#260655: debian-installer: MD5 check on sarge netinst beta 4 fails for ./README.html
Message-ID: <20040721172310.GE19623@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 20040721151017.38CED278039@bad.dynu.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040721151017.38CED278039@bad.dynu.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 260655-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Debian User wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: minor
>=20
> Mounting the sarge netinst beta 4 .iso (on loopback), cd'ing to that dir,=
and running:
>=20
> md5sum -c md5sums.txt
>=20
> Gives an error. README.html has the wrong md5sum... assumably because it =
was
> edited after the checksums were generated.
beta4 is rather old. This is fixed in the daily builds.
--=20
see shy jo
--ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA/qZ+d8HHehbQuO8RAr9wAJ0eSmiNHxl3jfNFYRLYBspg6mHL7QCfTNde
MKbII4F7lddB40kxlscRf8E=
=Cbda
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY--
Reply to: