On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 04:12:28PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote: > Quoting "W. Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>: > > I used the netinst (105 MB image) of 2004-07-01. Some problems occured: > > Many thanks for the replies. I hope, I can try the same hardware > again, when 2.6.7 is used by the d-i. It's not mine, unfortunately. > I will report about any success or failure. > > One remark: The link was > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/ > It would be very, very, very useful, if the initial boot screen would > show the REAL version (e.g. "sid 2004-07-01" or "sarge 2004-07-02") > instead of "build on 2004-05-28" or so which is plainly wrong. Most > d-i users/testers could give much better indication of what d-i > version they use, with a useful version string in the boot screen! The "build on 2004-05-28" is not wrong. It's the date the initrd on this image was built. Despite that it would be nice to have the iso build date there too. Gaudenz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature