[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#255138: marked as done (Installation report for TC1 on Dell PowerEdge 2650 (99% Flawless!))



Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:12:49 +0200
with message-id <20040619071249.GM6628@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Bug#255138: Installation report for TC1 on Dell PowerEdge 2650 (99% Flawless!)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 23:23:57 +0000
>From sam@oddbox.org Fri Jun 18 16:23:57 2004
Return-path: <sam@oddbox.org>
Received: from dante.rogueriver.k12.or.us [198.237.134.121] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BbSiD-0004Qr-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:23:57 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dante.rogueriver.k12.or.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DDE6E99
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dante.rogueriver.k12.or.us ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (dante [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 16973-06 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
	Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.237.134.124] (unknown [198.237.134.124])
	by dante.rogueriver.k12.or.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3176E94
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[🔎] 40D37960.7030408@oddbox.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:23:12 -0700
From: Sam Powers <sam@oddbox.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Installation report for TC1 on Dell PowerEdge 2650 (99% Flawless!)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at rogueriver.k12.or.us
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

I just got this new server, a Dell PE 2650 in at work, and before I let 
this ship sail, I thought it might be nice to try some various 
installation methods on it, with d-i TC1.

Some info about the server: It is actually supported by Woody with 
bf2.4. It's got a PERC scsi controller, which is handled by aacraid.
This particular machine is configured in a 2/3 split backplane, 
mirror/raid5. These are shown as /dev/sda and /dev/sdb respectively.
Since it's a Dell, /dev/sda1 already exists to contain diagnostics and 
such. I'll be leaving this alone, as I find them useful.

First, I tried using the built in management card's floppy booter, to 
test a fully remote installation via the management card, but it didn't 
work out -- It can only be used for booting, not switching floppies 
after booting. Well, _maybe_ that would work in an OS that used the BIOS 
to access the floppy, but not Linux. I don't know about this, but I 
would be interested to hear any possible workaround not involving 
physical contact with the server. I was just sort of curious to see if 
it would work.

Second, I burned and booted the TC1 netinst iso sarge_d-i/i386/tc1 
/sarge-i386-netinst.iso with linux26 debian-installer/framebuffer=false

It booted fine, the installer started okay, but  during the hardware 
detection, I got 2 spurious errors while running 'modprobe -v aic7xxx'. 
One during CD-ROM detection, the other during network hardware 
detection. This happens under 2.4 and 2.6.

During network hardware detection, with linux26, it failed to detect the 
network adapter. 2.4 didn't fail, and detected both "BROADCOM 
Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703X Gigabit Ethernet" adapters, using what I 
think is the 'tg3' driver.

Partitioning, installing base from the CD, and installing grub went 
perfectly. The CD ejected. I used ext3 for my root filesystem, and xfs 
on everything else. Grub booted the system. Base-config was entirely 
successful. Very nice job, folks.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255138-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2004 07:30:13 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Sat Jun 19 00:30:13 2004
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-227-253.adsl.proxad.net (kheops.homeunix.org) [81.56.227.253] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BbaIm-0003R4-00; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:30:12 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2BC04406C; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:29:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 23200-05; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3])
	by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 68D174058; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [127.0.0.1])
	by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DDA23277;
	Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 20829-01; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:12:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id 35FE42327D; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:12:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:12:49 +0200
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Sam Powers <sam@oddbox.org>, 255138-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#255138: Installation report for TC1 on Dell PowerEdge 2650 (99% Flawless!)
Message-ID: <20040619071249.GM6628@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <[🔎] 40D37960.7030408@oddbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 40D37960.7030408@oddbox.org>
X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too.
X-pot_a_miel: honeypot@kheops.frmug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at mykerinos
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org
Delivered-To: 255138-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

As I mentioned you on IRC, these boxes are very similar to 1750 on
which I already has success with beta4 install for kernel 2.4

> Second, I burned and booted the TC1 netinst iso sarge_d-i/i386/tc1 
> /sarge-i386-netinst.iso with linux26 debian-installer/framebuffer=false
> 
> It booted fine, the installer started okay, but  during the hardware 
> detection, I got 2 spurious errors while running 'modprobe -v aic7xxx'. 
> One during CD-ROM detection, the other during network hardware 
> detection. This happens under 2.4 and 2.6.
> 
> During network hardware detection, with linux26, it failed to detect the 
> network adapter. 2.4 didn't fail, and detected both "BROADCOM 
> Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703X Gigabit Ethernet" adapters, using what I 
> think is the 'tg3' driver.

This is a well known problem with 2.6 where the tg3 driver has been
dropped for...ahem....religious reasons (comment is from meand others
may disagree).

tg3 is supposed to be back in 2.6 some time.

As this is basically a success report, I hereby close it. Thanks a lot
for your time and your tests which confirmed that tc1 has a GO for
these machines (and probably most of Dell Poweredge servers...I also
tested on 400SC).




Reply to: