Bug#220874: marked as done (installation report)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:03:10 -0400
with message-id <20040611200310.GA6322@kitenet.net>
and subject line processing report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2003 11:01:55 +0000
>From debian@gepro.cz Sat Nov 15 05:01:55 2003
Return-path: <debian@gepro.cz>
Received: from main.gepro.cz [195.250.145.48]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AKyBe-0003bd-00; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 05:01:54 -0600
Received: from debian by main.gepro.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AKyBd-0006US-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:01:53 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installation report
Message-Id: <E1AKyBd-0006US-00@main.gepro.cz>
From: Jan Kuznik <debian@gepro.cz>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:01:53 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:sarge-i386-netinst.iso 13-Nov-2003 16:16
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/LinuxDate: <Sat Oct 15 11:20:00>
Method: CD,CD
Machine: Connectix virtual PC
Processor: P4
Memory: 128M
Root Device: IDE /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: made by cfdisk from scratch
/dev/hda1 1 969 488344+ 82 Linux swap
/dev/hda2 * 970 8126 3607128 83 Linux /
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge(AGP disabled) (rev 03)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01)
00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI
00:08.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c764/765 [Trio32/64/64V+]
00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21140 [FasterNet] (rev 20)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [E]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install basesystem: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
the installation program is unable to detect "modprobe tulip" went OK.
Autoprobe fails suggesting manual install, manual install ends in a
red screen, nevertheless tulip module gets loaded and eth0 interface is
alive. One can ignore the error and continue succesfully.
Note: in the case of official beta release from Nov 9, the
same problem is fatal. Moreover the Nov 9 release is unable
to spawn cfdisk (endless loop starting cfdisk)
Jan Kuznik
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 220874-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 20:03:18 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Fri Jun 11 13:03:17 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BYsFB-00082v-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:03:17 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-91-136.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.136])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8746918687
for <220874-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:03:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 604156EC36; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:03:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:03:10 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 220874-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: processing report
Message-ID: <20040611200310.GA6322@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: 220874-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm processing old installation reports, and have, finally, gotten to
yours.
I'm closing your installation report, after determining that:
- Your report mentions some strange problems that seem unlikely to be
present in current versions of the installer.
If you can, please try installing again using a current version of the
debian installer. I recommend the tc1 release, which you can find on our
web page, <http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/>. If you can, try
to reproduce the problems you reported using it, so we can verify that
they're all fixed. We look forward to your new installation report.
--=20
see shy jo
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAyg/9d8HHehbQuO8RAugMAKDO0Qk6VTl9Z37gJWPu0DR0Vzh1qQCg0Zjx
j6moWCpF1xFfhpOw0K/gu3Y=
=CDCI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--
Reply to: