Op di 25-05-2004, om 18:50 schreef Martin Michlmayr:
> * Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> [2004-02-11 13:32]:
> > Op wo 11-02-2004, om 00:29 schreef Bastiaan Van Eeckhoudt:
> > > I made this remark before, but no harm in repeating it: if I select
> > > nl_BE, I should get be-latin1 as default keyboard.
> >
> > I disagree, it should be be2-latin1. be-latin1 is incomplete, IMO.
>
> What's the default now and are people happy with it?
AFAIK, nobody uses be-latin1, except, as I found out this week, on
RedHat, where be2-latin1 has been merged into be-latin1, and where 'our'
be-latin1 doesn't even exist anymore. Perhaps that's not a bad idea.
The difference between be2-latin1 and be-latin1 is that be2-latin1
actually gives the characters as they appear on the keyboard, while
be-latin1 does nothing more than an approximation. This has bitten so
many people, that it's one of the oldest entries in the be.comp.os.linux
FAQ...
> > > GRUB dialog translation: "niew-geïnstalleerd" should be "net geï
> > > nstalleerd". This is consistent with later occurences of the term.
> > > "schif" should be "schijf"
> > > "gebruiken wilt" should be "wilt gebruiken"
> > >
> > > The final screen before rebooting:
> > > "veranderd" should be "verandert"
> > > "op-maat-gemaakte" should be "op maat gemaakte"
> > > "het installatiemedia" should be "het installatiemedium"
> >
> > Please take these to the debian-l10n-dutch mailinglist, where we discuss
> > translations (BTW, help is still welcome there :-)
>
> Did you come to agreement about these?
There aren't really many things one could disagree with; I merely
mentioned this to make Bastiaan aware of the l10n-dutch mailinglist.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend