Bug#232237: install report
* Oscar Bosman <oscarb@netspeed.com.au> [2004-02-12 00:38]:
> The partitions were given long pathnames I couldn't interpret instead of
> the usual /dev/hda[16789] I was expecting but I dealt with it
It is using much better names now.
> My general impression is that the installer does everything but it's
> somewhat klunky and I'm often asked to provide info that I don't have. It's
> not as straight forward as the RedHat installer I've used a number of
> but it's a lot better than my woody install.
Can you please try a new image from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and let us know
what you think of it. Are there any major usability problems with it,
or does it ask for information you don't have readibly available or
which is not clear?
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: