[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#243231: marked as done (contains an empty cdrom-core-modules)



Your message dated Mon, 17 May 2004 21:07:42 -0700
with message-id <20040518040742.GA27336@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2004 22:22:12 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun Apr 11 15:22:12 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BCnL9-0001zu-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:22:12 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-93-157.access.naxs.com [216.98.93.157])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DF317DEB
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:22:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F0F506E12D; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:21:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:21:50 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: contains an empty cdrom-core-modules
Message-ID: <20040411222150.GA9708@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.54
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: linux-kernel-di-sparc
Version: 0.53
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i

joey:~>dpkg --contents
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-sparc32-di_0.53_sparc.udeb
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2004-03-21 14:21:38 ./

I don't know what if anything is supposed to be in this udeb, but it
should not be empty.

(Severity serious because the next version of kernel-wedge will make
this package FTBFS due to this problem.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAecT+d8HHehbQuO8RAh3mAJ9nZw8sfpewYGXUU1xsT+A3dlnzlgCdGhDv
OUwvsRfiu5YdywqiReJ0Ujk=
=v9Ur
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 243231-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2004 04:07:43 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Mon May 17 21:07:43 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.84] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BPvtH-0005V2-00; Mon, 17 May 2004 21:07:43 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.213.94 with login)
  by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 May 2004 04:07:43 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7])
	by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74972DF23
	for <243231-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 May 2004 21:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BPvtG-000779-00
	for <243231-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 May 2004 21:07:42 -0700
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 21:07:42 -0700
To: 243231-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: done
Message-ID: <20040518040742.GA27336@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 243231-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Acknowledging this self-NMU-closed bug :)

--=20
Joshua Kwan

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=1jku
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--



Reply to: