Re: unused udebs?
* Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> [2004-05-13 11:21]:
> > atari-fdisk
> This may be unused but I'm not sure.
No, it is used. partman doesn't work on atari:
- Don't use partman for m68k/atari and q40 at all (isinstallable),
but make it default for all other m68k subarchs.
> > dhcp
> > dhcp3
>
> One of these is not used, but we'll keep them both in case we decide to
> change.
I think we're in the process of switching from dhcp to dhcp3, but I
agree with Joey about keeping them.
> > jfsutils
>
> We don't currently use this package, but it can remain in case someone
> wants to add the UI support for creating jfs filesystems.
In fact, someone just requested this today.
> > kernel-patch-2.4.19-mips
>
> AFAIK we're using the linux-kernel-di system for the mips kernel udebs
> now, do the udebs procuded by this package are not needed. We're also up
> to the 2.4.25 kernel on mips now. At least the udebs from this source
> pacage can be removed, I think.
The udebs can definitely go, but Karsten wants to keep the 2.4.19
package in the archive for a while. We'll definitely remove it before
sarge is released, though.
> > mii-diag
> I don't know of anything that uses this or why this produces a udeb.
I just requested this udeb, but it seems joshk incorporated its source
code into d-i directly because it's so small. I'm not sure whether
this is a good idea or not.
> > raidtools2
>
> I don't see anything stating a depends on this, I think we use mdadm
> instead?
Yes, we se mdadm. I'm considering supporting both mdadm and
raidtools2, but this would basically mean a) creating the right config
file and b) installing the right package in the chroot. For d-i, we
could just use mdadm in both cases. So this udeb is not needed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: